Presentations
Following the opening session in the afternoon of March 6th, the state of the arts presentations were given by six participants.
In addition, a quick reconnaissance report of the Indian earthquake that occurred on January 26th was also given. The presentations on the day were given open to the general public.
The individual presentations on March 7th were given separately in two groups, i.e., group A and group B.
The topics for discussions in this workshop were announced in advance as
follows.
- Current Methods of Practice of SSI in U.S. and Japan
- Geotechnical Point of View
- Structural Point of View
- Code Provisions and Limitations.
- Observed Data.
- Observational Arrays and Testing Facilities - Current, Future and Needs.
- Recent Research Results and How To Implement Them into Practice.
- Needed Additional Research.
- Needed Additional Observational Arrays and Testing Facilities.
Discussions
After the individual presentations, the group discussions were made for
efficient general discussions.
The topics with group A were the earthquake recordings, experimental measurement
and the publication of those data. Group A mainly discussed on the data
acquisition such as measurement of the strong motion recordings or experiments,
and construction of the data bases.
The topics with group B were design issues, pile foundations, liquefactions
and coverer wide range of technical issues related to SSI problems.
The discussions can be summarized as follows.
Group A
- It is necessary for the researchers, to definitely recognize the current
status of the SSI-related researches
- To identify the available data in both countries etc. A proposal was posted
to publicizing the data available and introduced during this workshop in
both countries as data libraries.
- The possibility to conduct the blind prediction test utilizing these publicized
data. It was also acknowledged to pursue the possibility of such activities.
- The group members discussed the necessity of dense instrumentation, such
as to investigate the rotational components of the ground motions. It is
indispensable for the advancement of the methodology in SSI effect.
- The group member also discussed on the future organization of the workshop
to bring the benefit from the workshop.
- Other items such as the followings should draw further attentions.
Non-linearity issues: currently insufficient in experiments and analyses
- Identification issues
- Seismic margin entangled in SSI phenomena, unexpected seismic margin in
low-to-mid rise buildings
- Energy dissipation mechanism in SSI phenomenon
Group B
The discussions were extensively done in Group B.
- Construction of database on in-situ measurement or earthquake recordings
and experiments. The action should be taken to construct the database from
the instrumentations in real size structure including foundation and ground.
Some problems will be anticipated, however, it might cause less conflict
that some organization in public position such as BRI or AIJ for Japan
side, and NEES (Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation) for U.S.
side takes the leading role.
- Enhancement of seismic performance of pile foundation.
Pile cap connections: There are number of research works concerning pile
cap connections recently in Japan. They say that the semi-rigid connection
might be better. On the issue, the technique should be verified with experiments.
In earthquake recording in structures not only sensors attached in superstructures,
foundations and soils, but also strain gauges, sensors such as optical
fibers in piles so that the transfer of forces in the foundations can be
detected. These ideas are important for improving the seismic performances
of pile foundations.
- Important topics in future will be as follows;
- Efficiency of pile group
- Influence of soil non-linearity (Liquefaction-countermeasured soil, ground
deformation)
- Non-linearity in SSI (modeling in uplift and its effect on response of
superstructure)
- Elucidation of kinematic interaction (analysis method and observation system)
- Mechanical property of piles (strength and deformability)
- Effectiveness of oblique piles
- Effectiveness of embedment
- Simple procedure for introducing SSI effect in Seismic Design
General discussions
The general discussion is summarized as follows.
- Definition of SSI is changing.
Originally: how soil compliance influences dynamic response of superstructures
(buildings, nuclear contained structures)
Today, anything related to soil response during earthquakes (e.g., deformation,
wave propagation, lateral spreading, liquefaction, etc, that in any way
influences the earthquake response and performance of structures, whether
they are directly supported on, or partially or totally embedded within
the soil (kinematic and inertial effects).
- Significant progress was observed since the 1st UJNR workshop on SSI, such as the sophisticated tools, which allow one to incorporate complex soil, and structural behavior into analyses improved the understanding of basic phenomena on SSI
- Elastic analysis vs. inelastic soil and structural response
- SSI evaluation by microtremor: how to extrapolate to design levels: dynamic
stiffness; radiation and material damping
- Foundation compliance affects distribution of inertial response
- Limitations of analysis
- Bridges: Joints, pounding, abutments
- Buildings: infills, overstrength, etc.
- Mixed foundations
- Load transmission
Recommended actions
The following items were recommended for actions in near future by the
workshop participants.
- SSI research must address needs of practitioners.
- We need to bring SSI to building and code level design (situation different
from nuclear industry).
- We need to develop simple yet sufficiently accurate physical and mathematical
models for obtaining realistic estimates of SSI effects
- We need to gain sufficient physical insight to develop these models.
- We need to recognize that the instrumentation and model test (both in the
lab and in the field) most play an essential role.
- We need to compile/summarize existing data
- We need to conduct experiments to calibrate and compile models - tests
an centrifuges and shake tables
- Specific topics need further studies. Those are,
- Pile group for either stable or unstable soils
It is essentially very complex behavior.
The response of foundation highly sensitive to small changes in configuration
and material properties
No simplified analysis tools are available yet.
- Pile connections (fixed vs. pinned design); bridges vs. buildings; retrofit vs. design
- Damage Inspection
It is very difficult to access for inspection after earthquake. (It is
necessary to develop suitable instrumentation techniques)
- Non-linearity
Geometric: uplift; contact gaps
Material behavior: soil and structural
Kinematic loading
Damage in soft or liquefied soils
Examine damage evidence in other conditions; tunnels vs. bridges vs. pipelines vs. buildings.
- Liquefaction issues
Site response when liquefaction is involved.
Prediction of magnitude of displacements
Restraint on lateral spreading
For collaboration between researchers of both countries, (including any
other countries) the followings two items are added with emphasis.
Exchange of research information concerning SSI
Creating a forum to give opportunity to send or exchange information concerning
SSI between U.S. and Japan. Establishing web site to publicize the research
results (research paper, list of published documents, database) To make
this effect, we need to seek for organization to take lead and budget to
manage with. Both U.S. and Japan sides have problems in easily accept such
heavy duty. It is proposed that an extensive discussion between active
groups in each side.
Construction of Database
It was recognized from both sides that formation of database of earthquake
recording and experiment measurement data are necessary to promote the
extensive SSI study. It was introduces that in the field of liquefaction
and seismic micro-zonation, there have been some tries of forming database
of examples. In case of earthquake recordings in buildings, not only the
records but also soil and structure data are important. Therefore, an effort
to collect such background data including acquiring a permission of owners
of the structures is also needed. For the end, it was agreed that each
organization should take initiatives to make database and to try to make
such data open to the public.
|